Bosworth v. Sewell
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge.
Heirs to an estate appeal the dismissal of their will contest action, claiming the failure of the personal representative to provide them actual notice of the probate of a will precludes the § 473.083.1, RSMo 1994,1 six-month statutory bar. We find the Missouri probate code requires actual notice to heirs of a decedent and failure to give such notice precludes the statutory bar to any heir without knowledge of the administration of the estate while the estate is open. As to appellants Allen and Lomax, we overrule the motion to dismiss, reinstate the will contest, and remand this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Abrams v. Ohio Pacific ExpressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Hadlock v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Treasurer of the State v. WitteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Newman v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- United Pharmacal Co. of Missouri, Inc. v. Missouri Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Habjan v. EarnestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Lomax v. SewellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.