Commonwealth v. Warrick
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This is a direct appeal nunc pro tunc from a judgment of sentence entered after appellant, James Warrick, pled guilty to the crime of escape. 1 We affirm.
The charge underlying the instant appeal stems from appellant's behavior after judgment was rendered at a criminal trial held in 1983. The Honorable Mitchell Lipschutz found appellant guilty of narcotics possession on December 5,1983. Immediately after the verdict was handed down, appellant ran out of the courtroom and down the stairs of the City Hall. However, police officers caught appellant before he left the building and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. DeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. AikinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Leonard v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ManneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.