Plant Lipford, Inc. v. E. W. Gates & Son Co.

Prentis, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

*328In this case onr labors have been greatly increased because of disregard of the second rule of this court, requiring a concise abstract or statement of the facts, and by the failure to concede that the verdict of the jury has settled the substantial conflicts in the testimony.

We state the facts a's we gather them from the record, which are determined by the verdict, and for brevity, as well as for clearness, omit many incidental matters.

E. W. Gates & Son Company, Inc. (plaintiff), was a wholesale grocer, importer and manufacturers’ agent, while…