Barton v. Camden
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Prentis, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
T. 1ST.. Camden, plaintiff in the trial court, has recovered of A. O. Barton, hereinafter sometimes called the defendant, $1,500 damages, claimed as for a malicious prosecution.
The evidence presents' issues of fact, and the contentions of the parties may be thus summarized: The plaintiff’s claim is, that after he had caught the defendant’s son with liquor in his shop (which was rented of *267defendant and jointly occupied), and threatened to make complaint unless the practice was stopped, Barton took the matter up with the plaintiff and made it a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- P. Lorillard Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Mills v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Puckett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Bell v. KeepersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Morris v. CartwrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Burnette v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Silva v. TraverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. ChildressArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Truman v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.