Legal Opinion
Sunshine Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mai
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided February 2, 1959No. Civ. 48PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REGISTER, Chief Judge.
The trial judge makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiff, a foreign corporation, is a citizen and resident of the State of South Dakota, with its home office and principal place of business located in the City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Said plaintiff is authorized to do and is doing business in the State of North Dakota.
2. Defendant Walter Mai is a resident and citizen of the State of North Dakota; defendant Richard Mai is a resident and citizen of the State of Montana ; and defendants Elsie Peterson and Arthur S.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Odden v. Union Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
- Hinton v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Persellin v. State Automobile Insurance Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Larry Gillen v. Globe Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Gangel v. BensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Globe Indemnity Company v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Company, a Foreign Corporation v. Inga LukinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. RonholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.