Legal Opinion
Persellin v. State Automobile Insurance Ass'n
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1948No. File 7079PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuekb, J.
In this action plaintiff sought to recover damages, as an additional insured -within the provisions of an “omnibus clause” contained in a policy of automobile insurance, issued by the defendant insurance company to Felix Farrar of Fargo. The defendant denied that plaintiff was included within the definition of an insured person contained in such “omnibus clause”. The case was tried to the court without a jury and a judgment for the defendant was granted and entered. Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment:
Felix Farrar is engaged in a merchandising business at Fargo, N. D. Sometime in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Grant v. KnepperNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Peterson v. MaloneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Norman Buntin v. Continental Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.