Legal Opinion

National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. Ronholm

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1967No. 8318PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment entered in favor of the respondent, National Farmers Union Property and Casualty Company, hereinafter referred to as respondent.

The facts are not essentially in dispute. Respondent is the liability insurer of Clarence N. Halvorson. The automobile insured by the respondent, a 1949 Ford sedan, was purchased by insured’s son, Tyrone Halvorson, in 1961 but title was held in the name of his father. Clarence N. Halvor-son is the named insured and Tyrone is listed as an additional driver (50%) on the application. The insurance policy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Jurd v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Tomasetti v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Motorists Insurance Company v. SamsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. HoweDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1984
  3. MFA Ins. Companies v. MendenhallNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. RagatzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API