Legal Opinion
United States v. Dyess
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided December 12, 2002No. CR. 29900012-01. No. CR. 299-00012-02. No. CR. 299-00012-10PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DISQUALIFICATION ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is Defendants’ motion to recuse or disqualify the Office of the United States Attorney (U.S. Attorney) for the Southern District of West Virginia or such of its members as the Court may deem appropriate. A hearing was held on the motion December 9, 2002. Present were the Defendants, in person, and by counsel, John G. Hackney, Jr., counsel for Dyess, Thomas J. Gillooley, counsel for Spencer, and Robert A. Ratliff, counsel for Bartram. The Government was represented by Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) Philip H.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Calvin DyessCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Michael Jason BartramCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- United States v. DyessDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
- Nolasco v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.