Legal Opinion
Nolasco v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 3, 2004No. 02 Civ. 3451(SAS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Pro se petitioner Eddy Bello No-lasco 1 seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging a June 20, 1997 Order 2 of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) deporting him from the United States to the Dominican Republic. See Record at 28. To challenge his order of deportation, Nolaseo. filed a petition pursuant, to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on February 22, 2002. That court transferred the case to the Southern District of New York because it found that Nolaseo was then detained in…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Campbell v. GanterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Wright v. DuncanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- Caesar v. AshcroftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Heung Wah Wong v. AshcroftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005