Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Jason Bartram

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 29, 2005No. 99-4566PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Judge GREGORY wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment.

OPINION

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

I

The defendant, Michael Jason Bartram, pleaded guilty to a one-count information charging distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On appeal Bartram raises several issues chai-*309lenging the judgment of the district court and the constitutionality of his sentence in the Southern District of West Virginia. For the reasons…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. IsaacksSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. United States v. Joseph Junior RevelsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. DyessCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. GloverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API