United States v. Michael Jason Bartram
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Judge GREGORY wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment.
OPINION
WIDENER, Circuit Judge:
I
The defendant, Michael Jason Bartram, pleaded guilty to a one-count information charging distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On appeal Bartram raises several issues chai-*309lenging the judgment of the district court and the constitutionality of his sentence in the Southern District of West Virginia. For the reasons…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. IsaacksSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- United States v. Joseph Junior RevelsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. DyessCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. GloverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.