Legal Opinion
United States v. Dyess
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided December 17, 2003No. CRIM. 2:99-00012-01, CRIM. 2:99-00012-03, CRIM. 2:99-00012-10, CRIM. 2:99-00012-12PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, District Judge.
Pending are Defendants’ motions for various forms of relief in this case, which was remanded from our Court of Appeals before decision on direct appeal.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Criminal Cases
On February 17, 1999 a federal grand jury in this district returned a thirteen-count Superseding Indictment charging Calvin Douglas Dyess (Calvin), Eric Dewayne Spencer (Spencer), Orange Dyess (Orange), Michael Jason Bartram (Bar-tram) and nine co-defendants with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine base,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Johnson, Ex Parte Antrone LynellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Calvin DyessCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Calvin DyessCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.