Legal Opinion
Lynn v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 5, 2012No. 42401-1-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, J.
¶1 To obtain services from the Department of Social and Health Services (Department) Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD), an applicant must have a qualifying developmental disability that constitutes a substantial limitation to the individual. Gregory Lynn is diagnosed with autism, a developmental disability, and multiple mental illnesses, including bipolar I. Lynn sought DDD services, but the Department, an administrative law judge (ALJ), and the Board of Appeals concluded that under the law Lynn was not entitled to benefits because he could not prove that his substantial adaptive…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Robert E. Weinreich v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Andrew H.K. Wong v. The Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- White v. BealCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Utter v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Utter v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOC. & HEALTH SER.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steve Baumgarten v. Seattle Police DeptCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020