Legal Opinion

Brackney v. Boyd

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1919No. 10,062PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Putnam Circuit Court; John H. James, Special Judge. Proceeding by Ida Cullen Boyd and Jackson Boyd for a writ of. assistance'on tbe petition of the latter, against Daniel C. Braekney and another. From a judgment for the petitioner, ;the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, P. J.

— The appellánts were the owners of lots numbers 1 to 6, inclusive, Higert’s subdivision in the city of Greencastle, Indiana, and executed their mortgage thereon to the appellee Ida Cullen Boyd. After the making of said mortgage the said Higert’s subdivision, including said lots, and streets and alleys abutting them, was duly vacated according to the law and- the easement of the public removed therefrom. 4 The situation is better understood by reference to, the following plat:

*594

Thereafter, to wit, on August 9,1912, said appellee Ida Cullen Boyd commenced suit in the Putnam Circuit Court against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Terre Haute & Southeastern Railroad v. RodelIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Emerick v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. City of Logansport v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Irvin v. CrammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. TeWalt v. TeWaltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Wolff v. Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 4715Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Davisson, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Jacqua v. HestonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API