Legal Opinion

Jacqua v. Heston

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1924No. 11,729PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDausman, P. J.

(after stating the facts) :

The undisputed evidence shows that lot 114, as originally designated on the recorded plat, is 112 feet deep, measured east from Bridge Street. How far, if at all, does the tract conveyed to Bettie Farris Heston extend into lot 113? If the southwest corner of lot 114, as originally designated on the plat, be taken as the point of beginning, then it follows, as a matter of -computation, that her tract extends twenty feet into lot 113. By the seventh paragraph of the special finding, the court fixes the east line of her tract thirty-two feet east of the west line of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Mt. Carmel v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gerke v. Citizens State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Bergan v. Cooperative Ice & Fuel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Brackney v. BoydIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryant v. School Town of Oakland CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. George Talbot, Jr. v. The Citizens National Bank of EvansvilleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  3. Mooshy v. Kirman Rug & Trading Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Adams v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API