Legal Opinion

Starling v. Selma Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1915PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Connor, J., at September Term, 1914, of JOHNSTON.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. The plaintiff’s intestate, a bright little boy 5 years of age, was drowned in a reservoir on defendant’s premises, Saturday afternoon, 20 February, 1909. The reservoir was about 50 feet around, with a brick wall around it. It was 2 or 3 inches from the top of the brick wall to the water on the inside. Rev. Mr. Morris testified that there had been a fence around the reservoir and that there was still “a piece of one there at the time of the drowning, of the little boy,-Alma Starling.” He testified that the fence was put up with post-oak posts,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Hood v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Tussey v. . OwenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Helms v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Eureka Lumber Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Housing Authority of Atlanta v. FambleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Gibbs v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Hampton v. . Spinning CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Bass v. Quinn-Robbins Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API