Hartman v. Roberts-Walby Enterprises, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that defendant Roberts-Walby Enterprises, Incorporated, a tavern owner, and its surety, United Bonding Insurance Company, were liable to the plaintiff under the dramshop act 1 because of illegal sales of intoxicating beverages by the tavern owner to plaintiff’s husband.
Both defendants were duly served with copies of the summons and complaint. The tavern owner answered but no answer or appearance was filed in behalf of the surety. A default judgment in the sum of $5,000 was entered against the surety. Thereafter it moved to set aside the judgment. That motion was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walters v. Arenac Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Merrinane v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Hartman v. Roberts-Walby Enterprises, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Crew v. ZabowskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Paynton v. PayntonMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Cramer v. Metropolitan Savings Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Asmus v. BarrettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Shawl v. SPENCE BROS., INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Butler v. CannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.