Shawl v. SPENCE BROS., INC.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant Spence Brothers, Inc., appeals by leave granted the trial court’s order denying its motion to set aside a default in favor of plaintiffs James Shawl (Shawl) and Mary Shawl. On appeal, Spence Brothers argues that the trial court erred as a matter of law by applying the wrong standard in denying its motion to set aside the default. In addition, Spence Brothers argues that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside the default. We reverse and remand.
I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Boice Bird and Sons, Inc., employed Shawl as a journeyman painter. Spence…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. CiprianoMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. KacharMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Hardy v. Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Saffian v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Huntington National Bank v. RistichMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Alfreda Moses v. Richard NethersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bank of the West v. Hardrock Hdd IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Walter N SlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Durga Property Holdings Inc v. Holiday Park Realty LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.