Hartman v. Roberts-Walby Enterprises, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.
We granted leave to review an order of the Court of Appeals granting a motion to dismiss an appeal claimed as of right to that Court from the circuit court of Oakland county.
*108The relevant facts are as follows:
In April, 1964, plaintiff-appellee began an action under the “dramshop” act* against the defendant tavern keeper, Roberts-Walby Enterprises, Inc., and its statutory surety defendant-appellant, United Bonding Insurance Company. Service on the surety was made pursuant to statute on the insurance commissioner. According to appellant surety company it sent the copy of the process to its…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Hartman v. Roberts-Walby Enterprises, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Hosner v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. NormanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. AlfafaraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Caughey v. RozyckiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.