Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Gentry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

A careful perusal of tbe record leaves us witb tbe impression tbat no reversible error bas been shown, and tbat tbe verdict and judgment should be upheld. However, it appears tbat tbe affidavit, upon- which tbe order of appeal in forma pauperis was allowed, was not made during tbe term or within five days thereafter as required by C. S., 649. See Powell v. Moore, 204 N. C., 654, 169 S. E., 281; McIntire v. McIntire, 203 N. C., 631, 166 S. E., 732. This defeats our jurisdiction. Berwer v. Ins. Co., 210 N. C., 814, 188 S. E., 618; S. v. Mitchell, 221 N. C., 460. “Giving bond on appeal, or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Powell v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Honeycutt v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. McIntire v. . McIntireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Berwer v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Anderson v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Clark v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API