Legal Opinion

State v. . Mitchell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Upon the call of the docket from the Tenth District, the district to which the case belongs, the Attorney-General lodged a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that it is in forma pauperis without order allowing it, or affidavit sufficient to support such an order. This was met by counter-motion for certiorari to correct the record and to have the affidavit and order allowing the defendant to appeal in forma pauperis sent up by the clerk of the Superior Court of Alamance County.

The clerk has certified two affidavits, one dated 28 February, 1942, which omits to state that “the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Powell v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. State v. . MarionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. State v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Franklin v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Franklin v. GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API