Legal Opinion

Berwer v. Union Central Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The affidavit filed in the appeal in forma pauperis is defective, in that it does not contain the averment required by O. S., 649, that appellants are “advised by counsel learned in the law that there is error in matter of law in the decision of the Superior Court in said action.” This is a jurisdictional requirement and for that reason the appeal must be dismissed. Hanna v. Timberlake, 203 N. C., 556. See, also, an applicable discussion of this subject in Powell v. Moore, 204 N. C., 654.

On 16 November, 1936, the appellants made an additional affidavit containing the averment omitted from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Powell v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Hanna v. . TimberlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. . HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Clark v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Franklin v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Franklin v. GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API