Legal Opinion

Kyle Rayome v. ABT Electronics Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 9, 2024No. 1:21-cv-02639Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KYLE RAYOME, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 21 C 2639 ) v. ) Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole ) ABT ELECTRONICS, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER “Relevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” Nw. Mem'l Hosp. v. Ashcroft,

362 F.3d 923, 930

(7th Cir. 2004). “The standard for relevance [in discovery] is most often viewed quite liberally so as to allow for broad disclosure of information.” General…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API