Legal Opinion
Hazeltine Corporation v. White
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 8, 1934No. 78PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
This suit was brought originally under the provisions of section 4915, Rev. St. (35 US CA § 63), against the defendant Sidney Y. White alone. White moved to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The motion was granted with leave to amend by adding as adverse parties the two additional defendants. The bill was so amended and an order of notice was sent them by registered mail. Thereupon each of the three defendants appeared specially and moved to dismiss. Tha motion of White was to dismiss the suit generally on the ground that the other two defendants were indispensable…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Butterworth v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Mallow v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- In Re Keasbey & Mattison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Parker Rust-Proof Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Coe v. Hobart Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Edenborn v. WigtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Standard Oil Company v. Montecatini Edison SpADistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
- Baldwin v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.