Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 5, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, District Judge.
These four actions in equity are brought by receivers of national banks to recover funds now on deposit with the defendant, Chase National Bank of the City of New York. Since all four cases raise the same legal problems, discussion will be limited to the Baldwin case, with the conclusions to be considered as applicable to the other three.
In January, 1923, the Secretary of War, acting for the government of the Philippine Islands, opened a deposit account in the Commercial National Bank of Washington, the account being captioned, “Treasurer of Philippine Islands, Treasury…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bradford v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Zwack v. Kraus Bros. & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Berger v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Albers v. Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- Adams v. CribbisDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.