Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Company v. Montecatini Edison SpA

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 8, 1972No. Civ. A. 4319, 4321 and 4323PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATCHUM, District Judge.

All three of the above civil actions have been brought in this Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146 to review a decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences entered on November 29, 1971 which awarded priority of invention of the subject matter of Interference No. 89,634 to Montecatini Edison, S.p.A. (“Montecatini”). The parties in all three suits are identical except that Novamont Corporation (“Novamont”), a Delaware company and wholly owned subsidiary of Montecatini, was named as an additional party defendant in Civil Action No. 4321.

These cases are…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Japan Gas Lighter Association v. Ronson Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
  5. United States v. Washington Institute of Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Earl's Tire Service, Inc. (In Re Earl's Tire Service, Inc.)District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  2. Smithkline Corporation v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  3. Tuckman v. Aerosonic Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978
  4. Faulkner v. University of TennesseeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. First v. State ex rel. LarocheMontana Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API