Legal Opinion
United States v. Vitasafe Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1962PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
This is a motion by the Government to strike six affirmative defenses. Defendant is engaged in the manufacture and sale of vitamin and drug products. In 1957 the Federal Trade Commission entered a cease and desist order, on defendant’s consent, whereby defendant was prohibited from making certain specified representations and engaging in certain practices in the sale of vitamins and other articles of merchandise. The present action is brought to recover civil penalties pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 4=5 (Z) for violations of the cease and desist order. The violations consist…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vanity Fair Paper Mills, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- National Candy Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Ostler Candy Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- United States Bio-Genics Corp. v. ChristenberryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- U.S. Bio-Genics Corp. v. Robert K. Christenberry, Postmaster, New York, N.Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Swingline, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- United States v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. JB Williams Company, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- United States v. ACB Sales & Service, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.