Legal Opinion
United States Bio-Genics Corp. v. Christenberry
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1959PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
These are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff seeks an injunction restraining the defendant from carrying out the terms of a fraud order issued by the Judicial Officer of the Post Office Department (Department). 1 The defendant seeks an order dismissing the complaint.
The undisputed facts are these: On July 15, 1957, a complaint was issued by an Assistant General Counsel of the Department, addressed to the Chief Hearing Examiner thereof, and recommending that a fraud order be issued against plaintiff. This relief was sought on an allegation that plaintiff “is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Jay v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Donaldson v. Read Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Reilly v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Democrat Printing Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Vitasafe CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- United States v. Beatrice Foods Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
- Carl Brandenfels v. J. Edward Day, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- U.S. Bio-Genics Corp. v. Robert K. Christenberry, Postmaster, New York, N.Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Jackstadt v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.