Legal Opinion
Vanity Fair Paper Mills, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 27, 1962No. 27562_1PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.
Vanity Fair Paper Mills, Inc., petitioner here but to which we will hereafter refer as “respondent”, the position that it occupied before the Federal Trade Commission, asks us to set aside an order of the Commission finding that it violated § 2(d) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1527 (1936), 15 U.S.C. § 13(d), quoted in the margin. 1 We deny the petition and will enforce the order save for a single minor modification.
The evidentiary record, a four-page stipulation of facts with three attached exhibits, tells us the following; Respondent is in the business of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Pete Bouldis v. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. A.P.W. Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dorn's Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. St. Regis Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.