Legal Opinion

Dillon v. . Wentz

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1947PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

Tbe City of Charlotte having elected to have its employees become eligible for participation in tbe North Carolina Local Gj-overnmental Employees’ Retirement System, and its active firemen having joined said System, tbe question presented on this appeal is: Shall tbe Charlotte Firemen’s Retirement Fund Association be dissolved and its assets liquidated, and, if so, bow shall tbe assets of tbe Association be distributed ?

A careful consideration of tbe Acts under which this Association operated leads us to tbe conclusion that its status was that of an unincorporated mutual benefit association.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. United States v. TellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. People Ex Rel. Donovan v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Police Pension & Relief Board v. McPhailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Hawkins v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Miller v. ScholtenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Harrill v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API