Legal Opinion

Cresap v. Chemplast, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 13, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 893-60PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff herein sues the defendant for infringement of United States Patent No. 2,929,109, dated March 22, 1960, the original application having been filed in United States Patent Office December 30, 1954.

The defendant answers and counterclaims, seeking judgment of invalidity of the patent and non-infringement.

During the year 1954 plaintiff experimented in methods of making articles of certain shapes from Teflon powder, a patented product of duPont Company, by compressing the powder into a preform of the desired shape, removing the preform from the molding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alco Kar Kurb, Inc. v. Victor L. Ager, Doing Business as Totowa Concrete Block Company and Two Guys From Harrison, Totowa, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  2. Alco Kar Kurb, Inc. v. AgerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental Can Company, Inc. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Charles N. Cresap v. Chemplast, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. Continental Can Company, Inc. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API