Legal Opinion

Stephen Rug Mills v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 11, 1944No. 4477PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

The issue in this appeal arises from a judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division, overruling three protests of appellant against the classification of certain machine-woven small cotton rugs classified by the Collector of Customs at the port of New York under paragraph 921 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem as “ * * * other floor coverings, * * * wholly or in chief value of cotton * *

Appellant claimed the involved merchandise to be properly dutiable . at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. United States v. HoytCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Timber Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API