Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Louisiana v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1979No. REC 77-11-15804, CA12179PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

The state petitioned for reconsideration of our decision reported in 39 Or App 325, 591 P2d 1196 (1979). The state contends that under the Oregon statutes, based upon the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), the Oregon courts cannot modify a support order of another state. The contention is based on ORS 110.271:

"Any order of support issued by a court of this state when acting as a responding state shall not supersede any previous order of support issued in a divorce, separate maintenance or any other proceedings, but the amounts for a particular period paid pursuant to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nebraska v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Louisiana v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCaffery v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Mullis v. MullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. White-Nathan v. NathanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. In the Matter of Marriage of TavaresOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. McCaffery v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API