Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Louisiana v. Phillips
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 19, 1979No. REC 77-11-15804, CA 12179PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
The issues in this appeal are whether the trial court had jurisdiction to modify a support order certified to this state under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), ORS 110.005 et seq, and whether the Oregon support award was adequate.
The parties were married, had three children and were divorced in California. Wife was awarded custody and support in the amount of $100 per month per child. In 1968, wife brought a URESA action in California which was certified to Oklahoma and that court decreased support to $50 per month per child. In 1976, wife again filed a URESA action,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCaffery v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Mullis v. MullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- State ex rel. Louisiana v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- In the Matter of Marriage of TavaresOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- McCaffery v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1997