Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Petitioner (hereinafter Applicant) seeks review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter Board) denying reconsideration' of a referee’s order denying recovery of compensation from the Subsequent Injuries Fund (hereinafter Fund).
Procedural Facts
On September 5, 1969, Applicant made application for workmen’s compensation benefits from his employer, alleging an industrial injury to his heart on October 18, 1968. On December 24, 1969, Applicant, his employer and its insurance carrier filed a compromise and release dated' December 18, 1969, proposing to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Russell v. Bankers Life Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Robinson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.