Legal Opinion
Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 2, 1974No. Civ. 43317PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, J.
The Subsequent Injuries Fund seeks review and annulment of an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board which found real party in interest (Wilbur D. Royster, hereinafter “applicant”) to be 100 percent permanently disabled, attributing 69V2 percent to an industrial injury during the period September 1, 1967 through March 30, 1971 and 301A percent to a preexisting injury to the back and heart which had previously been awarded to applicant.
The Facts
On January 21, 1971, the board found that applicant had sustained an industrially caused, cumulative injury to his heart…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mercier v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Amico v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Morgan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.