Legal Opinion

Young v. City of Scribner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1960No. 34849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiffs, Julius Young and Ruby Young, as owners of a dwelling house property known as Lot 10, Block 39, in Scribner, a city of the second class, brought this action in equity against defendant city seeking to require it to remove certain obstructions theretofore placed by defendant in its drainage ditches in the city street to the south and east of plaintiffs’ property; to enjoin defendant from thereby casting surface waters on plaintiffs’ premises; and to recover damages to their property caused by such obstructions and inadequate drainage which flooded plaintiffs’ property. The primary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Byrnes v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Lincoln & Black Hills Railroad v. SutherlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Pevear v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Peters v. Woodmen Accident and Life CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Goodrich v. University PlaceNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elledge v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Eunice Harrington Investments, Ltd. v. WallaceNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hickman v. HunkinsNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API