Legal Opinion

Pevear v. City of Lynn

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 12, 1924PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These are actions of tort to recover compensation for damages resulting from a flooding of the premises of the several plaintiffs. Each cause of action is founded on alleged negligent maintenance of the sewer system of the defendant.

The law governing actions of this nature is settled. A *488municipality is not responsible for damages which accrue to individuals through any defect or inadequacy in the plan of its system of sewers, because that is established by public officers acting, not as its agents, but in a quasi judicial capacity for the benefit of the general public. A municipality is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Diamond v. Inhabitants of North AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Manning v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Buckley v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Robinson v. City of EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Harvard Furniture Co. v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Anglim v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Lobster Pot of Lowell, Inc. v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. Bartol v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API