Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Coldren

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 1956No. 5-929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. SeaborN Holt, Associate Justice.

This is a-suit for specific performance of an option, contract to purchase real estate. Appellant, Mrs. Bertha Kelley , (as vendor) and Mrs. Sarah Coldren (as vendee) on April 7, 1947, entered into an option agreement containing these provisions: “That Vendor is the owner of the following real estate situated in Cross County, Arkansas, described as follows, to-wit: Part of the West Half (W %) of the West Half (W %) of Section 34, hounded and described as follows: [then follows a complete'.metes and hounds description]. It is the understanding of,the parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hogan v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Routen v. Walthour-Flake Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Lion Oil Refining Company v. FlocksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. I.R. Kirk Farms, Inc. v. PointerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Wiener v. Farm Credit Bank of St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1991
  3. Russell v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Smith v. Northeast Randolph Development Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API