Wiener v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Louis
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
EISELE, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by defendants Eastern Arkansas Planting Co. and N.S. Garrott & Sons; and Motion for Leave to Amend Cross-Claim filed by defendant N.S. Garrott & Sons. The parties have responded to the Motions. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted and the Summary Judgment Motions by defendants will be denied. Defendant Garrott’s Motion to Amend Cross-Claim will be granted.
I. HISTORY
This litigation centers…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Agribank FCB v. Cross Timbers Ranch, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Province v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Wiener v. Eastern Arkansas Planting Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Bailey L. Wiener Lee R. Wiener v. Eastern Arkansas Planting Company, an Arkansas General Partnership, West Memphis, Arkansas N.S. Garrott & Sons, an Arkansas General Partnership, West Memphis, Arkansas Agribank, Fcb. Bailey L. Wiener Lee R. Wiener v. Eastern Arkansas Planting Company, an Arkansas General Partnership, West Memphis, Arkansas N.S. Garrott & Sons, an Arkansas General Partnership, West Memphis, Arkansas, Agribank, FcbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992