Hogan v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The parties to this suit concede that the written instrument copied in our statement of facts, which is the basis of this lawsuit, is an option contract, within the rule laid down in Indiana & Arkansas Lbr. & Mfg. Co. v. Pharr, 82 Ark. 573, and we shall so treat it.
The consideration recited in the option contract was one dollar, and the defendants did not complete the contract by the payment of the $6,000 recited in it before the plaintiffs withdrew their offer.' There is some conflict in the authorities as to whether or not there must be a valuable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bradford v. FosterTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
- Lawrence v. MahoneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Jones v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Ashcraft v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Indiana & Arkansas Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. PharrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'Connor v. PattonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Duclos v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Silbernagel v. Hirsch Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Kelley v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Russell v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.