Legal Opinion

Russell v. Hill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 24, 1964No. 5-3152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

This litigation involves an option deed. Walter Hill and his wife were plaintiffs below and are appellees here; and Tommy H. Russell and his wife were defendants below and are appellants here.

On an uncertain day1 in April 1962 Walter Hill and wife executed an instrument, whereby Tommy H. Russell acquired an option to purchase a lot for $21,300.00, provided the said amount was paid on or before April 1, 1963. On February 8, 1963, Hill and wife filed this suit to have the instrument declared void and removed as a cloud on their title. On February 28, 1963,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Read's Drug Store v. Hessig-Ellis Drug Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Doup v. AlmandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Dickinson v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Hogan v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. TM Oil Co., Inc. v. PasqualeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Heartland Community Bank v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API