Legal Opinion
Haney v. State Farm Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 12, 1988No. 19935-8-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Schumacher, J. *
Michael Haney and Jacqueline Nissen-Haney appeal from the trial court's order of dismissal granting State Farm's motion for summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Michael Haney and his wife, Jacqueline Nissen-Haney, were seriously injured when their automobile, a 1970 Maverick, was struck by an underinsured driver. They also owned another vehicle, a 1979 Ford pickup, and both vehicles were insured by State Farm under separate policies. The insurance policy covering the Maverick contained underinsured motorist (UIM) limits of $100,000 per person and $300,000…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Vadheim v. Continental InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Andrews v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mostow v. State Farm Ins. Cos.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE v. GannonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., Inc. v. WintersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Sloan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.