Legal Opinion

Broadway Hale Stores, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 30, 1969No. C. D. 3816PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

This protest covers a consignment of mirrors and wood mirror frames, separately invoiced and packed, shipped from Spain and entered at Los Angeles in August 1965. The official papers, in evidence, tell much of the story.

The mirrors and frames were shipped pursuant to plaintiff’s purchase order No. 1263 to Rugil, a manufacturer in Sevilla, Spain, for household decorative items consisting of mirrors and mirror frames measuring 30 x 16 inches and 27% x 16 inches. Consumption entry filed at Los Angeles was based on two invoices. A Rugil invoice covered 250 wooden gilt frames 27% x…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Dwight v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. M. H. Pulaski Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. United States v. Metropolitan Aluminum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Alltransport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oxford International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. Irving W. Rice & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Roser Customs Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API