Legal Opinion

Alltransport, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 20, 1967No. C.D. 2896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The protest in this case relates to merchandise described on the invoice as “4200 Dozen Mirror Rose (19 Petals) With 2 Sets op 5 Pcs. Leaves. 914" Long. Colour : Pink.” The importation came from Hong Kong. The articles involved were classified by the collector under paragraph 230(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Protocol of Terms of Accession by Japan to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 53865, supple*99mented by T.D. 53877, as mirrors not exceeding in size 144 square inches. Duty was assessed at 35 per centum ad valorem. In their protest, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudson Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. Engine Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Broadway Hale Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Styson Art Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API