Legal Opinion

Community Redevelopment Agency v. Matkin

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1990No. G006439PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Ana (the City) appeals an order awarding litigation expenses to O. A. Matkin and Dorothy Matkin in the underlying condemnation action. The threshold issue is whether the Matkins, in failing to serve a demand for compensation 30 days before the originally scheduled trial date, forfeited their right to recover their litigation expenses pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1250.410 14 1 . The City contends the court erred, as a matter of law, in finding the Matkins’ demand was timely. Alternatively, it assigns error…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Community Redevelopment Agency v. KrauseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Water Resources v. AndresenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Los Angeles Unified School District v. C. F. Bolster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Santa Clara Valley Water District v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glendale Redevelopement Agency v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. In Re Market Center East Retail Property, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Hansen's Truck Stop, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API