Glendale Redevelopement Agency v. Parks
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, (A. M.), P. J.
This appeal by Robert and Audrey Parks (appellants) is from judgment in an eminent domain proceeding initiated by the Glendale Redevelopment Agency (Agency). The court below denied appellants’ motion for litigation costs, for interest on a deposit of funds made prior to possession and their challenge to the constitutionality of Code of Civil Procedure section 1268.350, setting the rate of interest in eminent domain proceedings.
The facts are as follows. Additional facts will be set forth as necessary to our discussion of the legal issues.
In 1987, appellants owned a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. YukiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- San Diego Metro. Transit Dev. Bd. v. CushmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Inglewood Redevelopment Agency v. AkliluCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Tracy Joint Unified School District v. PomboCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.