Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. Erwin Cotton Mills Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

What duty is imposed upon an employer with reference to tbe sufficiency of help furnished an employee? The general rule is that it is the duty of an employer of labor to exercise ordinary care in furnishing to an employee adequate help or assistance in the performance of the wort required of such employee. This duty is primary and nondelegable and ranks in importance with the duty of an employer to exercise ordinary care in furnishing a safe place to work. The question has been considered by this Court in many decisions, notably the following: Bryan v. R. R., 128 N. C., 387; Shaw v. Mfg. Co.,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pigford v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Shaw v. Highland Park Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Strunks v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Winborne v. Interstate Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Williams v. Kentucky River Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Christie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. August v. Texas & N. O. R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. RobardsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Kenneth TalleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API