Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Robards

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1947No. 5577PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

This action arises from allegations of injuries sustained by an employee because of an employer’s negligence in failing to provide sufficient help. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, the defendant and appellant (hereinafter called A. & P.), an Arizona corporation, hired Dorothy Ro~ bards, an infant, who sues by her next friend (hereinafter called plaintiff), to work in an A. & P. store located in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. Plaintiff claims that she was injured on April 10, 1945, while in this employ, and instituted suit for damages in the United States District…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bulluck v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Fields v. Equitable Life AssuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Bechtler v. BrackenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Bechtler v. . BrackenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Newbern v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co. v. Consumers Cooperative Association. Consumers Cooperative Association v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. Long v. Clinton Aviation Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. American Cyanamid Co. v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. Of America v. McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. Garcia v. De LeonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API