Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fitzpatrick-Cromwell Co. v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1901No. 14,136PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPLICATION for writs of Certiorari and Prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Blanchard, J.

Anton Erey brought suit against the Fitzpatrick-Cromwell Co. alleging that in October 1900 he had sold and delivered to that corporation a lot of hides at eight cents per pound, but that the company, claiming some of the hides were damaged and not worth the price, caused those asserted to be damaged to be weighed separately.

The company, it seems, also claimed that some of the hides were calf skins and not worth the price offered for the other hides.

The seller, it is averred, did not at the time concede either of those claims of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oliver ex rel. Rowland v. OliverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  2. Second Municipality v. CorningSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849
  3. State ex rel. Butchers' Union Slaughter House & Live Stock Landing Co. v. Judge of the Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  4. Gilly v. RoumieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
  5. Parsons v. SuaresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1836

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frey v. Fitzpatrick-Cromwell Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Hennington v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Pittman v. LillySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. Swift & Co. v. Leon Cahn & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Yazoo & M. V. R. v. TeissierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API