Legal Opinion

Frey v. Fitzpatrick-Cromwell Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1902No. 13,983PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans— Ellis, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Blanchard, J.

Plaintiff sold defendant a lot of hides. Dispute arose relative to the quality and price of some of the hides, with the *126result that defendant would not pay the sum plaintiff demanded, and plaintiff would not receive the amount defendant offered.

Whereupon, plaintiff brought this action to recover $2,539.30 as the price and value of the hides sold.

Defendant answered disputing plaintiff’s version of the facts, giving its statement of the transaction, and averring that on this controversy arising, in order to avoid litigation, and with that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fitzpatrick-Cromwell Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  2. Zimmermann v. LanglesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  3. Brown v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  4. Thompson v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
  5. Willard v. LugenbuhlSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HusseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Briede v. BabstSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Johnson v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1956
  4. Wunderlich v. SimpkinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Certified Roofing Co. v. JeffrionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API